<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 vs. Google Chrome OS &#8211; Why Google might fail miserably</title>
	<atom:link href="http://windows7themes.net/windows-7-vs-google-chrome-why-google-will-fail.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://windows7themes.net/windows-7-vs-google-chrome-why-google-will-fail.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:09:13 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DekuLink</title>
		<link>http://windows7themes.net/windows-7-vs-google-chrome-why-google-will-fail.html#comment-15592</link>
		<dc:creator>DekuLink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7themes.net/?p=971#comment-15592</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure you have the wrong idea.

The Google Chrome OS isn&#039;t a full OS to rival against Windows or OS X or Ubuntu. But it&#039;s rather for netbooks. People usually use netbooks just to get online, and they don&#039;t really do anything else. This is supposed to take the operating system out of the picture to simplify it.

I&#039;m sure Google will eventually make a FULL operating system, but this isn&#039;t it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure you have the wrong idea.</p>
<p>The Google Chrome OS isn&#8217;t a full OS to rival against Windows or OS X or Ubuntu. But it&#8217;s rather for netbooks. People usually use netbooks just to get online, and they don&#8217;t really do anything else. This is supposed to take the operating system out of the picture to simplify it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Google will eventually make a FULL operating system, but this isn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://windows7themes.net/windows-7-vs-google-chrome-why-google-will-fail.html#comment-14590</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7themes.net/?p=971#comment-14590</guid>
		<description>1st Chrome OS will have differing affects in different regions of the world and will be more popular in developing countries.

2nd Since it&#039;s not &quot;time tried and reliable&quot; (MS is time tried and reliability is predicable but not guaranteed) it&#039;ll resort to more of a hobbist or an educational type environment where money spent is far more important than money made.

3rd When Chrome goes live the hourglass will turn over for it also.  When MS began in the 80&#039;s programming tools were made readily available and were cheap, some even free.  My first copy of Basic 5 was free and my upgrade to 7.0 was very cheap (oop&#039;s I&#039;m telling my age).  I was even given a free copy of Visual Basic for MS-DOS (bet some of you never knew such an animal existed) just for attending a MS siminar in Charlotte, NC.  That&#039;s where loyalty is generated; give programmers tools for low to no money that they earn money to feed their families with and a following (not love) is built.

4th Marketing is dirty business.  MS literally drowned IBM&#039;s OS2 (which I and my brother worked on modules for big blue, now I&#039;m really telling my age) and IBM was forced into the decision of if the chase was worth the prize.  OS2 was a much more mature OS early on and had the promise of connecting the PC world to really Big Iron in a more direct fashion than WindowsNT or LAN-Man, but MS had the marketing.  Put Windows 7 (full version) on a billion netbooks and pass&#039;em out like candy and it&#039;ll be a very tuff act to follow.  Goggle&#039;s marketing machine is geared towards advertising other companies products; when they start touting their own stuff as much or more than the other guys, their purse will drain quickly, remember &lt;i&gt;&quot;a house divided can not stand&quot;&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1st Chrome OS will have differing affects in different regions of the world and will be more popular in developing countries.</p>
<p>2nd Since it&#8217;s not &#8220;time tried and reliable&#8221; (MS is time tried and reliability is predicable but not guaranteed) it&#8217;ll resort to more of a hobbist or an educational type environment where money spent is far more important than money made.</p>
<p>3rd When Chrome goes live the hourglass will turn over for it also.  When MS began in the 80&#8217;s programming tools were made readily available and were cheap, some even free.  My first copy of Basic 5 was free and my upgrade to 7.0 was very cheap (oop&#8217;s I&#8217;m telling my age).  I was even given a free copy of Visual Basic for MS-DOS (bet some of you never knew such an animal existed) just for attending a MS siminar in Charlotte, NC.  That&#8217;s where loyalty is generated; give programmers tools for low to no money that they earn money to feed their families with and a following (not love) is built.</p>
<p>4th Marketing is dirty business.  MS literally drowned IBM&#8217;s OS2 (which I and my brother worked on modules for big blue, now I&#8217;m really telling my age) and IBM was forced into the decision of if the chase was worth the prize.  OS2 was a much more mature OS early on and had the promise of connecting the PC world to really Big Iron in a more direct fashion than WindowsNT or LAN-Man, but MS had the marketing.  Put Windows 7 (full version) on a billion netbooks and pass&#8217;em out like candy and it&#8217;ll be a very tuff act to follow.  Goggle&#8217;s marketing machine is geared towards advertising other companies products; when they start touting their own stuff as much or more than the other guys, their purse will drain quickly, remember <i>&#8220;a house divided can not stand&#8221;</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geo</title>
		<link>http://windows7themes.net/windows-7-vs-google-chrome-why-google-will-fail.html#comment-12974</link>
		<dc:creator>Geo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7themes.net/?p=971#comment-12974</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mean to sound like a pessimist but seriously,  there&#039;ll be even more monotony and monopoly if Google takes over. I prefer both OSes sitting close to the same level. Chrome OS for basic browsing, that OS that you boot if you just want to be on and off quickly, Windows if you need to do something more intense like Modern Warfare 2. 

I also don&#039;t trust in clouds as much, they seem to bring rain every so often and when they do, my Gmail goes poof. Now if Google could somehow partner with Backupify and back up your cloud data, there might be less concern here. I&#039;m interested to see what happens in the end though. I will test Chrome OS alongside Windows 7 when a beta is released. No I don&#039;t want a virtual machine image, I want the real deal with most of the features done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mean to sound like a pessimist but seriously,  there&#8217;ll be even more monotony and monopoly if Google takes over. I prefer both OSes sitting close to the same level. Chrome OS for basic browsing, that OS that you boot if you just want to be on and off quickly, Windows if you need to do something more intense like Modern Warfare 2. </p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t trust in clouds as much, they seem to bring rain every so often and when they do, my Gmail goes poof. Now if Google could somehow partner with Backupify and back up your cloud data, there might be less concern here. I&#8217;m interested to see what happens in the end though. I will test Chrome OS alongside Windows 7 when a beta is released. No I don&#8217;t want a virtual machine image, I want the real deal with most of the features done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QXT</title>
		<link>http://windows7themes.net/windows-7-vs-google-chrome-why-google-will-fail.html#comment-12967</link>
		<dc:creator>QXT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7themes.net/?p=971#comment-12967</guid>
		<description>Hi All,

Google OS is a LINUX based OS and therefor supports a load of hardware. Also boots under 6 seconds and runs on the Google Chrome browser as a interface. It was NOT designed to be a full fledged OS like Windows 7. But rather something you can run on a cheap netbook.

Also.. I run Linux 24/7 and only use windows 7 for games. I do not even use Microsoft&#039;s Office anymore. So the features that come with the browser interface (gmail, google docs, etc) is PERFECT for everyday use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All,</p>
<p>Google OS is a LINUX based OS and therefor supports a load of hardware. Also boots under 6 seconds and runs on the Google Chrome browser as a interface. It was NOT designed to be a full fledged OS like Windows 7. But rather something you can run on a cheap netbook.</p>
<p>Also.. I run Linux 24/7 and only use windows 7 for games. I do not even use Microsoft&#8217;s Office anymore. So the features that come with the browser interface (gmail, google docs, etc) is PERFECT for everyday use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://windows7themes.net/windows-7-vs-google-chrome-why-google-will-fail.html#comment-8018</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7themes.net/?p=971#comment-8018</guid>
		<description>Sorry mate,

but Google failing seems to be quite unlikely.

If they can make people switch from Mozilla to Chrome, I&#039;m pretty sure beating Microsoft wont be all that difficult. Besides having followed Google quite carefully, I&#039;ve realized they happen to understand what users expect better than other companies.

Hence the confidence.

I&#039;ve used all versions of Windows, WindowsMe was probably the worse, followed by Vista. Seven is good but its missing something, dunno what ... just doesn&#039;t feel as great as XP

Maybe Google will be able to pull it off and rid of the monotony/monopoly of Windows/Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry mate,</p>
<p>but Google failing seems to be quite unlikely.</p>
<p>If they can make people switch from Mozilla to Chrome, I&#8217;m pretty sure beating Microsoft wont be all that difficult. Besides having followed Google quite carefully, I&#8217;ve realized they happen to understand what users expect better than other companies.</p>
<p>Hence the confidence.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used all versions of Windows, WindowsMe was probably the worse, followed by Vista. Seven is good but its missing something, dunno what &#8230; just doesn&#8217;t feel as great as XP</p>
<p>Maybe Google will be able to pull it off and rid of the monotony/monopoly of Windows/Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aakash</title>
		<link>http://windows7themes.net/windows-7-vs-google-chrome-why-google-will-fail.html#comment-7638</link>
		<dc:creator>Aakash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 09:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7themes.net/?p=971#comment-7638</guid>
		<description>i am sure google os will not be successfull as It does not have that experiance in IT field intalking about Os field.As microsoft Vista did not pass the test i am sure Windows 7 will not do the mistake of his elder brother.Bill gates is back to form.I heard a news that Microsoft is helping Google for the new Google Cromme Os.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am sure google os will not be successfull as It does not have that experiance in IT field intalking about Os field.As microsoft Vista did not pass the test i am sure Windows 7 will not do the mistake of his elder brother.Bill gates is back to form.I heard a news that Microsoft is helping Google for the new Google Cromme Os.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smarttoys9000</title>
		<link>http://windows7themes.net/windows-7-vs-google-chrome-why-google-will-fail.html#comment-5221</link>
		<dc:creator>smarttoys9000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7themes.net/?p=971#comment-5221</guid>
		<description>No other operating system will not replace Windows 7. Why? Because Windows recognizes device links in proportions of 99%. Any version of Windows are the system requirements. I used Linux and I contstat it&#039;s not the same efficiency as Windows. Abea if Mac can face as how ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No other operating system will not replace Windows 7. Why? Because Windows recognizes device links in proportions of 99%. Any version of Windows are the system requirements. I used Linux and I contstat it&#8217;s not the same efficiency as Windows. Abea if Mac can face as how &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotWayDown</title>
		<link>http://windows7themes.net/windows-7-vs-google-chrome-why-google-will-fail.html#comment-5005</link>
		<dc:creator>RotWayDown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7themes.net/?p=971#comment-5005</guid>
		<description>I agree with everyone so far, this will be one of the first major appearances of Cloud computing to the public, although I must agree with a lot of people that this is a risk that Google is taking basing an operating system off of. Most of the common-folk computer operators won&#039;t be aware of any &#039;privacy&#039; issues with the OS at first or if ever. If there are serious breaches of privacy, someone will unveil it and will spell a lot of trouble. Compatibility along with power and just a little user-friendliness(without the load so much) is what they need to aim primarily at to gain the highest amount of popularity. I don&#039;t so much think the method of cloud computing is ready to be released in an OS on top of the gaining popularity in anticipation of it. I do have hopes for it though, Google has done very well in recent years with its products, and being able to add a slight personal touch to their products and in my opinion, a rather impressive knack for being able to hit the nail on the head as far as what users are looking for. In that being said, I am looking forward to an interesting spin on an operating system that could very well prove useful. I never had a chance to dig into OSX too much, linux quite a bit more but not proficiently enough to feel comfortable. I plan to beta-test it as soon as it becomes available, and with a Linux kernal at its core, i&#039;m crossing my fingers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everyone so far, this will be one of the first major appearances of Cloud computing to the public, although I must agree with a lot of people that this is a risk that Google is taking basing an operating system off of. Most of the common-folk computer operators won&#8217;t be aware of any &#8216;privacy&#8217; issues with the OS at first or if ever. If there are serious breaches of privacy, someone will unveil it and will spell a lot of trouble. Compatibility along with power and just a little user-friendliness(without the load so much) is what they need to aim primarily at to gain the highest amount of popularity. I don&#8217;t so much think the method of cloud computing is ready to be released in an OS on top of the gaining popularity in anticipation of it. I do have hopes for it though, Google has done very well in recent years with its products, and being able to add a slight personal touch to their products and in my opinion, a rather impressive knack for being able to hit the nail on the head as far as what users are looking for. In that being said, I am looking forward to an interesting spin on an operating system that could very well prove useful. I never had a chance to dig into OSX too much, linux quite a bit more but not proficiently enough to feel comfortable. I plan to beta-test it as soon as it becomes available, and with a Linux kernal at its core, i&#8217;m crossing my fingers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalton R. Schwartzkopf</title>
		<link>http://windows7themes.net/windows-7-vs-google-chrome-why-google-will-fail.html#comment-4855</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalton R. Schwartzkopf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7themes.net/?p=971#comment-4855</guid>
		<description>Google will not replace Windows 7, but it will not fail. the only reason Chrome OS will not replace WIN7 is because it will not impose the dreaded although needed dot.net framework and some critical sys32 files for your run of the mill windows games. on the other hand some game companies publish MAC OSX and LINUX clones of their games, but not in a wide spectrum. All that may change because of the expected popularity of the Google Chrome OS. I have been a windows/MAC/LINUX user since MS-DOS, OSX Lepord, and the first release of Ubuntu. the only reason that MAC and LINUX aren&#039;t as popular as Windows is the simple fact that they don&#039;t play windows games, although the actual OS runs smoother and all around better than Windows, especially LINUX whict at its peak require only half of the needed resources of Windows 7 the achieve the exact same effect, both aesthetically and performance wise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google will not replace Windows 7, but it will not fail. the only reason Chrome OS will not replace WIN7 is because it will not impose the dreaded although needed dot.net framework and some critical sys32 files for your run of the mill windows games. on the other hand some game companies publish MAC OSX and LINUX clones of their games, but not in a wide spectrum. All that may change because of the expected popularity of the Google Chrome OS. I have been a windows/MAC/LINUX user since MS-DOS, OSX Lepord, and the first release of Ubuntu. the only reason that MAC and LINUX aren&#8217;t as popular as Windows is the simple fact that they don&#8217;t play windows games, although the actual OS runs smoother and all around better than Windows, especially LINUX whict at its peak require only half of the needed resources of Windows 7 the achieve the exact same effect, both aesthetically and performance wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darknight</title>
		<link>http://windows7themes.net/windows-7-vs-google-chrome-why-google-will-fail.html#comment-4613</link>
		<dc:creator>Darknight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://windows7themes.net/?p=971#comment-4613</guid>
		<description>Cloud Computing, is just a new name to an old game, back in the days it was called Mainframe computing. that model broke down. Sadly this &#039;Cloud&#039; model is brought back again and again and each time it fails, fails badly.

Lets see how long before Cloud clears..

Darknight</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cloud Computing, is just a new name to an old game, back in the days it was called Mainframe computing. that model broke down. Sadly this &#8216;Cloud&#8217; model is brought back again and again and each time it fails, fails badly.</p>
<p>Lets see how long before Cloud clears..</p>
<p>Darknight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
